BASTARDS Karnei Shomron Taxes Residents RETROACTIVELY

I didn’t think I could be surprised by the AUDACITY of government officials. But this is REALLY something.

The bastard YIGAL LAHAV the mayor gangster around here has decided to tax all of us in Karnei Shomron RETROACTIVELY for the months January to October 2014 and he has the kindness of heart to allow us to pay it UP TO THREE INSTALMENTS.

Is this even LEGAL? Is there any lawyer out there who can step in and help us 7,300 people?

Any private person who DARED charge someone retroactively for services already rendered and paid for would be PUT IN PRISON.

What disgusting GALL.

Here’s the sick letter.

http://www.karneishomron.co.il/?CategoryID=430&ArticleID=1760

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “BASTARDS Karnei Shomron Taxes Residents RETROACTIVELY

  1. you must lack sufficient public self-justified outrage, or you could band together and solve the problem with Alinksy tactics. parasites need their hosts for survival *.

    see these links for ideas:

    http://www.garynorth.com/public/6274.cfm

    https://www.dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014/8/28/speaking-laughter-to-power.html

    or you can pay him off. as they say, “an honest politician is one when when bought stays bought…”

    but the actual issue almost certainly lies in the Federal/national government, to which the local governments are mere lackeys with only cosmetic leeway.

    if you don’t believe me, see here for the technical details:

    http://www.kav.org.il/100994/811

    http://www.kav.org.il/100994/812

    [by the way, i don’t see you mentioning that site here. is it because they are not pure libertarians?]

    the sole seat of power here is in the Knesset, unlike in the US (at least in the far past and to a degree), which is part of Feiglin’s plan for government reform, as you know.

    * see more here:

    http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/10firstmonday.html

    In these and other areas, powerful perpetrators commonly use many or all of the following methods to inhibit outrage:

    cover up the action
    devalue the target
    reinterpret what happened by lying, minimising, blaming and framing
    use official channels to give an appearance of justice
    intimidate or bribe the people involved.

    Consider the example of torture. Governments that sanction torture hide its practice (cover up the action). They label the victims as criminals, traitors or terrorists (devalue the target). If challenged over their treatment of prisoners, governments may reinterpret what happened by claiming that torture techniques were not used (lying), minimising the effects, blaming rogue operators, or saying the interrogation methods were legitimate (framing). Occasionally they hold formal inquiries into allegations of torture, which may whitewash the actions or apply penalties to low-level perpetrators but almost never to policy-makers (official channels). Finally, they may threaten whistleblowers and offer rewards to those who co-operate (intimidation and bribery). All these methods were used in relation to the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib by US guards, revealed in 2004 (Gray and Martin, 2007).

    In response to these five types of methods of inhibiting outrage, targets can use five corresponding types of counter-methods:

    expose the action
    validate the target
    interpret what happened as an injustice
    avoid or discredit official channels; instead, mobilise support
    resist intimidation and bribery.

Comment here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s